<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internet censorship in Australia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liako.biz/2008/07/internet-censorship-in-australia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://Liako.Biz/2008/07/internet-censorship-in-australia/</link>
	<description>Blog of a thinker, writer and smart-arse</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 20:41:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nick Hac</title>
		<link>http://Liako.Biz/2008/07/internet-censorship-in-australia/#comment-116583</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Hac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2008 09:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Liako.Biz/?p=187#comment-116583</guid>
		<description>Won't somebody please think of the children...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Won&#8217;t somebody please think of the children&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Lewis</title>
		<link>http://Liako.Biz/2008/07/internet-censorship-in-australia/#comment-96491</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 13:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Liako.Biz/?p=187#comment-96491</guid>
		<description>Hi Elias,

Due to censorship you should probably fuzz out the persons signature and maybe even name on that letter that you got back from them.

It's old style censor tactics, which don't really work in the virtual world. Something really innovative needs to be started in order to protect children from harmful things on the internet.

I'm not sure what is worse, the news of ISP-Level Filtering... or the recent news that the Scottish Police are not allowed to use pictures of puppies on their adverts because it might offend people (new story about that: http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland/Apology-on-the-cards-as.4243889.jp )!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Elias,</p>
<p>Due to censorship you should probably fuzz out the persons signature and maybe even name on that letter that you got back from them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s old style censor tactics, which don&#8217;t really work in the virtual world. Something really innovative needs to be started in order to protect children from harmful things on the internet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what is worse, the news of ISP-Level Filtering&#8230; or the recent news that the Scottish Police are not allowed to use pictures of puppies on their adverts because it might offend people (new story about that: <a href="http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland/Apology-on-the-cards-as.4243889.jp" rel="nofollow">http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/scotland/Apology-on-the-cards-as.4243889.jp</a> )!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charlie</title>
		<link>http://Liako.Biz/2008/07/internet-censorship-in-australia/#comment-96274</link>
		<dc:creator>Charlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 08:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Liako.Biz/?p=187#comment-96274</guid>
		<description>It's really interesting that children nowadays have access to exactly the same content as adults. Maybe we'll have to stop patronising children soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really interesting that children nowadays have access to exactly the same content as adults. Maybe we&#8217;ll have to stop patronising children soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Reilly</title>
		<link>http://Liako.Biz/2008/07/internet-censorship-in-australia/#comment-96251</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 05:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Liako.Biz/?p=187#comment-96251</guid>
		<description>Actually Chris I suspect it's been thought up by the businesses who intend to pocket the $128 million. I've worked inside ISPs and inside large software companies and I'm well versed in how to make a pitch to governments about how to spend money that sounds good in a press release but in reality will never deliver any benefits. Then you sell it again to them in a couple of years with the "oh the technology has moved on, let's try again" pitch. You're right though that this will never see the light of day. It's just another $128 million of taxpayers money down the toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually Chris I suspect it&#8217;s been thought up by the businesses who intend to pocket the $128 million. I&#8217;ve worked inside ISPs and inside large software companies and I&#8217;m well versed in how to make a pitch to governments about how to spend money that sounds good in a press release but in reality will never deliver any benefits. Then you sell it again to them in a couple of years with the &#8220;oh the technology has moved on, let&#8217;s try again&#8221; pitch. You&#8217;re right though that this will never see the light of day. It&#8217;s just another $128 million of taxpayers money down the toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Broadfoot</title>
		<link>http://Liako.Biz/2008/07/internet-censorship-in-australia/#comment-96233</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Broadfoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 03:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Liako.Biz/?p=187#comment-96233</guid>
		<description>I highly doubt their plan will be ever put into effect, mostly due to technological reasons (packet inspection, etc) and the hardware that this would require.

Thought up by bureaucrats without any advice from those in the business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I highly doubt their plan will be ever put into effect, mostly due to technological reasons (packet inspection, etc) and the hardware that this would require.</p>
<p>Thought up by bureaucrats without any advice from those in the business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
